Closed Prompt #3

TEEN EDITORIAL: Lower America's drinking age

In our modern word, it is impossible to hide from alcohol. Yes the drinking age is 21, but let’s be honest, we all know what alcohol is years before it is legal. For many teenagers, drinking is a common pass time. Others are naïve to its prevalence. Whatever the case, no one can deny that alcohol consumption is a controversial conversation. Whether one is getting an MIP, getting grounded by their parents, or getting ignored by a friend for ratting out a party, it can be a roadblock in many teenage lives. This editorial by Madyson Foltz, a 16 year old in favor of lowering the drinking age, uses details, diction, and syntax to create effects and meanings.

         With her use of important, crucial, congruent details, Foltz supports her position. She does an impeccable job of uses details that draw the reader in and make them agree with her side of the argument. Foltz brings in the law, telling us  “the 1984 federal law set the drinking age to 21 is a contradiction of the rights already given to 18 year olds.” Statistics are used to inform the reader of false accusations. The author seamlessly ties in history too speaking about “Prohibition [not working] in the past, and [not] working now.” By including heated facts like “eighteen year olds are given the right to vote, serve on juries, get married, sign contracts, and get drafted into the military” Foltz supports her position with not only true but prevalent information.

          Foltz successfully uses diction to enhance her position. Although she is only 16, and therefore an amateur writer, one would not be able to tell that from her piece. She successfully uses mature language. Phrases like “forbidden fruit” and words like “taboo” give her an educated appearance. She is able to acknowledge the position of her opponents but use feeble words and phrases to lessen their significance. She then counteracts them with forceful words supporting her position. Many times throughout the piece, she uses drinking as a noun. For example, she calls it “a badge of adulthood.” This is a unique technique but it is used in an enticing way.

         Using syntax in a creative, effective way helps Foltz hammer her point into the heads of her readers. In multiple instances, she uses conjunctions and punctuation throughout the sentence to make the ending that much more apparent. Since she is writing about a controversial issue that undoubtedly has a strong opposing argument, it was imperative for her to comment on the negatives of her argument. By using correct syntax, she is able to do this in an impeccable way that doesn’t negate her position. For example, she states how “alcohol affects teens performance in school” but immediately uses her rebuttal statement that “A teen's performance, however, tends to be affected only when consumed in abundance.“ Her use of semicolons helps her tie ideas together seamlessly. For instance, she says, “Teenagers drink regardless of the law; to them, rebelling is enticing.“ Her flawless use of syntax helps her tie her abundance of ideas together without making the reader feel overloaded with information.

         Madyson Foltz uses details, diction, and syntax to create effects and meanings in her editorial on teenage drinking. She is able to pound her position into the reader’s head and gives them adequate facts to help prove her point. Although it is a controversial issue with many strong opinions on both sides, this 16 year old does a remarkable job while trying to take a stand for what she believes is right. 

http://lancasteronline.com/article/local/615707_TEEN-EDITORIAL--Lower-America-s-drinking-age.html

Open Prompt #3

2005, Form B. One of the strongest human drives seems to be a desire for power. Write an essay in which you discuss how a character in a novel or a drama struggles to free himself or herself from the power of others or seeks to gain power over others. Be sure to demonstrate in your essay how the author uses this power struggle to enhance the meaning of the work.

        

When the Hunger Games trilogy by Susanne Collins hit the best-seller list, the main attraction was the love battle between the teen heartthrobs Gale and Pita. Once unwrapping the text, the reader discovers the books represent much more then just a petty love story. They are unwrapping and exposing issues in government and society. The whole book is based on a future society where “The Capital” holds the power to control every aspect of the “districts” and Katniss Everdeen is attempting to destroy the powerful, evil controlling machine.

When her beloved little sister is chosen to take part in the annual Hunger Games-- a Capital controlled activity in which 24 children were thrown into a harsh environment and forced to kill each other until there is just one survivor-- rebellious Katniss Everdeen steps in and volunteers to take her innocent sister’s place. As the story rolls on and Katniss moves closer and closer towards the heart of the corrupt government, she wants nothing more then to strip away it’s power. Katniss becomes a symbol of rebellion and freedom: a light that shines over all of the Capital controlled districts.

         The whole book revolves around the idea of corrupt power. The Capital has sole control over all of its districts. It controls what they do, eat, wear, and survive. Susanne Collins uses this idea to propel the story and put the pieces together. The reader inevitably hates the Capital and everything they stand for. We give all of our love to Katniss. She holds the future of the Districts as they place their power into her hands. Power is a motif that represents not only aspects of the plot but individual characters as well.

By using Katniss Everdeen, Susanne Collins seamlessly intertwines a magnetic love story with a power struggle. The book revolves around a heart wrenching confrontation: The Capital vs. Katniss Everdeen and the rest of the districts. In the end, it is all about power: who has the power to win, to love, to fight, and to conquer. 

Response to Course Materials #3

            Coming into AP Lit, the idea of reading books over and over was tedious. But now, after analyzing The American Dream time after time, and currently working on a read-through of Death of A Salesman, I understand why we do it. Honestly, I like it. I feel like I actually get to understand every little detail in the piece, which makes for an overall more enjoyable reading experience. The first time through The American Dream, I literally had NO CLUE what was going on. But by the end, after reading it multiple times myself and participating in numerous class discussions, I finally understood the symbolism, the characters, and all the other dynamic, dense aspects of the story.

            So what else? Along with dissecting the American Dream, we learned about The Theatre of Absurd and comedy rules. Both of which, as awful as those packets were to annotate, actually helped me understand both the play and future readings. It is so strange to me, at first, this class seems like it is filled with such useless information (no offense Ms.Homes) but then, it all actually helps you. Even when I am sitting at home watching a movie I will think of some rule of comedy and see it in the movie. The more we discuss it in class, the more I understand how to use it. But that’s how everything is. The more discussions we have, from The American Dream to the literary terms, I understand it better and better. That is why those are my favorite days: the ones where we sit in a round circle and talk about whatever the topic of the day is.

            I am interested to see how I did on the in-class writings. It is hard to say if I need a tremendous amount of help on them or if I am some-what on tract. Hopefully, we will review those papers soon (both the ch.4 and The Century Quilt) so I can see what I need to do for them. While talking about the Ch.4 essay I will say I liked the paper MUCH better then the quiz. I felt like it helped me to actually have my book open while writing. The information actually made sense and I was able to put it to use instead of just attempting to memorize it for a quiz. I also really liked how we tied it to The American Dream. It was not only fun, but made me think abstractly too.

            And last, but certainly not least, the terms test TAKE 2. I am so frustrated with this test. I spent hours studying for it and I actually felt like I understood the information but then I ended up getting the exact same grade as last time. This was not only discouraging, but also confusing. It is hard for me to understand how some of those questions were fair. I mean honestly, something can be incongruity, verbal irony, and invective all at the same time. But on the brightside, I now feel like I actually understand the majority of the words and will be able to put them to use. Even now, I feel like my vocabulary has grown and that’s what that exercise was for. Right?